A section of the society
maintains that Ameerul Momineen – Hazrat Ali ibn AbiTalib (as) had good and
courteous relations with each of the three caliphs during their respective
reigns. In support of this opinion they bring instances and examples where
apparently there have been consultations between Ameerul Momineen (as) and the
three deviant caliphs on various topics.
We find claims such as these :
“He1 sought answers to his
difficulties in Ali’s company. Ali (as) explained to him issues not clear to
him. And he executed Ali’s (as) judicial decrees. Ali (as) too like a kind
lover used to guide his beloved. He did not keep anything short from him. We
shall deal with Ali’s (as) practical conduct with Umar. This will show good
relations between these two great historical persons.”!2
Let us examine the truth
behind this claim and examine whether the consultations of Ameerul Momineen(as)
with the caliphs are a sign of good terms amongst them or something else? Were
they really consultations in the true sense in the first place or
1[Umar]
2Muhammad
Barfi: Seemai Ali Az Manzar Ahle Sunnat (Portrait of Ali from the Sunni point
of view), [1st Edition 1380], Pg. 95
Ameerul Momineen (as) had to step in for some
other reasons. The reasons have been well summarised in this way :
“It must be acknowledged
that had not the Imam gone to help the Caliphs, Muslims would have been
involved in a great chaos. It was likely that Muslims could have even
apostised. Or when they did not receive an answer, Islam itself would have fallen
into suspicion and it was likely they would have denounced Islam as a false
religion.”3
After the martyrdom of Holy
Prophet (s.a.w.a.) his companions choose to give preference to selecting a
caliph over the very burial of their beloved Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a) by
gathering in a notorious place called Saqifa. They elected Abu Bakr as the
caliph of Muslims in 11 AH and he ruled as caliph for nearly two years before
finally dying in 13 AH. Umar ibn Khattab followed him to usurp caliphate and he
ruled as a caliph for ten years and was finally murdered in 23 AH. He was
followed by Usman who
ruled as caliph for twelve
years and was also murdered in 35 AH. Total period of caliphate between the
three of them is a noteworthy period of approximately twenty four years.
Now, if Ameerul Momineen
(as) really had good relations with each of these three caliphs, one would have
witnessed frequent and regular interactions and consultation between them.
Especially considering that most of the Muslims were such who had recently
accepted Islam and were new Muslims, the physical boundaries of Islam were
spreading to other parts of the world, the beloved Prophet of Islam (s.a.w.a.)
had just passed away and Muslims in general had a lot of queries, doubts not
only related to Shariat (Haraam and Halaal) but towards religion, ethics and
beliefs overall. Also the interest of other kingdoms towards Islam and their
scientific and intellectual questions directed towards the Caliphs of the
Muslims would have added to the numerous challenges and questions which the
caliphs and Muslims came across. As a result of which one would assume there
should have ideally been a lot of discussions and consultations between the
caliph and the companions and especially between Ameerul Momineen (as) and the
caliphs.
Surprisingly, if we dig
deep into this twenty four year period of caliphate between the three caliphs
we will see that there were only one hundred and seven (107) consultations
between Ameerul Momineen (as) and the three caliphs. Contemporary scholar,
Shaykh Najmuddin Askari in his book Min Noor-e-Ali, Part Two, Ali wa Khulafa,4 has mentioned these
instances. They have been tabulated and statistically analysed in the book A Victim Lost in Saqifah by Ali Labbaf page 218
We present the summary of
all instances mentioned above. The table below gives us an account of the
number of theses consultations during the rule of each caliph.
3Ali Muhammad Meer Jalili: Imam Ali (a.s.) wa Zamaamdaaraan
(Imam Ali and the Rulers), Pgs. 175 4Dar az-Zahra,
Beirut, 1st Edition, 1414
|
Period
of
|
|
|
|
Name
|
of
|
Caliphate
|
No.
|
of
|
Caliph
|
|
(Years)
|
Consultations
|
|
Abu Bakr
|
|
2
|
14
|
|
Umar
|
|
10
|
85
|
|
Usman
|
|
12
|
8
|
|
Total
|
|
24
|
107
|
|
It is noteworthy from the
above table, in a long period of 24 years which means 288 months and 8,640 days
of the caliphate, a meagre 107 consultations happened between Ameerul Momineen
(as) and the three caliphs. Please note there must have been a gap of
around 3 months on an average between two consultations !!!. If you ponder
over this fact and try to understand what it means, you would cry over it for a
long time and understand the patience of Ameerul Momineen (as). This clearly
removes the curtains from the notion that all was good between Ameerul Momineen
(as) and the three caliphs.
Now, let us further analyse
the nature of the 107 consultations. Were these consultations in the true
sense, where the caliphs came to Ameerul Momineen (as) to seek his respected
opinion on a matter or was it AmeerulMomimeen (as) who had to initiate or
rather interfere in the matters of caliphate to make his opinion prominent so
that Islam, the values of Islam and the religion of the Prophet of Islam is not
trampled upon.
Let us have a look at the below table too
Total Consultations
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
Questioner directly
referred to Imam
|
17
|
|
(as)
|
||
|
||
Questioner referred
to Imam (as)
|
|
|
after
consultation amongst the
|
28
|
|
companions
|
|
|
Imam (as) intervened in a
particular
|
|
|
matter after the news reached him
|
|
|
or
that he was
present there by
|
62
|
|
chance
or that the
matter was
|
|
|
presented to him directly
|
|
Of these 107 consultations–
on only 17 occasions was the questioner directly referred to Ameerul Momineen
(as) and on another 28 occasions the questioner was referred to Ameerul
Momineen (as) after consultation with the companions but on the majority of the
remaining 62 occasions Ameerul Momineen (as) had to interfere in a particular
matter. Interested readers can refer to the above link for further analysis of
topic wise questions referred by each caliph.
Thus, this leaves no ambiguity that Ameerul
Momineen (as) was not consulted by the three caliphs but it was rather Ameerul
Momineen (as) who had to interfere in matters of religious significance for the
sake of love which he had for the religion of Allah, the Almighty and for the
sake of love that he had for the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) so that the great
religion of Islam does not fall prey to heresy.
We should understand that
these statements quoted to show good relationships are far from truth :
“And in this way, Abu Bakr,
the First Caliph, has benefited from Imam Ali (a.s.) in difficult issues.”5
“Ali (a.s.) had a prominent
presence during the Caliphate of Umar, and had a position of presidentship
among the companions.”!6
“Circumstances during the
Caliphate of Uthman bin Affan were also like the tenures of the previous
Caliphs and he in numerous instances consulted His Eminence in problems
connected to faith and jurisprudence as mentioned in books of traditions,
jurisprudence and History.”!7
Infact, we get this fact
mentioned in history - Umar was asked about marriage and divorce and Umar answered.
Regarding this Amirul Momineen (a.s.) has said:
“He wrote down while I was
present there. But he did not ask me nor did he refer to me as though his
knowledge had enriched him beyond me. I wanted to correct him. But I preferred
to be silent because he will be vilified by God. But no one censured him. On
the contrary, they appreciated him. They made it a tradition. Even if a mad man
would have passed judgment it would have been better8”9
Let us have a look at one
such incident which indicates the state of affairs.
Umar who said that he was
once petrolling at night in Medina when he saw a couple in a half demolished
house engaged in the act of adultery. Next morning, he asked the people if the
Caliph sees some body committing adultery, could he punish the culprit at his
own accord, i.e., would that one eye witness of the Caliph himself be
sufficient for framing the charge of adultery against the culprit and punish on
that account.
All the people present in
the court of the Caliph including his advisers and some of the senior
companions of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) said with one voice:
“What more witness than the
eyewitness of the Caliph himself is required for punishing the culprit in a
case of adultery.”
5Abdul Kareem Bi-Aazaar
Shirazi: Seemai Imam-e-Muttaqeen, (Portrait of the Imam of the Pious), Vol. 6,
Pg. 14
6Ibrahim
Baizoon (Translated by Ali Asghar Muhammadi Seejaani): Rafataar Shinashi Imam
Ali (a.s.) Dar Aaina-e-Tareekh (Understanding the stand of Imam Ali in the
Mirror of History) (1st Edition), 1379], Pg. 42
7Muhammad Ali
Taskhiri: Article quoted in Kayhan Farhangi, Issue No. 184, Bahman 80, Pg. 32
8In another version it is mentioned: While it was such a
judgment that if a mad manhad judged this matter he would have said more than
this. 9Refer:
Muhammad Ismail Ansari Zanjani: Translation of Asraar Aale Muhammad, Pg. 340
Ameerul Momineen (as) when heard the above
unanimous advice of all the people present in the court of Umar he said to him
- in that case you would yourself be punished for false imputation, for a full
evidence required in each case of adultery under the religious law is equal to
four witnesses without any exemption whatsoever.
No comments:
Post a Comment